Birty Dastards Jeep Club

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: remaping ecu  (Read 5856 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

KELTICKNIGHT

  • Guest
remaping ecu
« on: April 15, 2006, 03:33:58 AM »
im looking at remapping the ecu or euc  or what ever it is in jeep cherokee crd 2.5 diesel
any good places and any recommendations
cheers in advance
p.s want to get rid of flat spot when you accelrate and get better pickup
Logged

greggmo

  • Founder
  • Forum Member
  • *
  • Guru: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8230
(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2006, 12:37:41 PM »
i dont think it is worth doing. if i remember right there was a thread about this not long back and dr mike explained why it was not worth doing.
Logged

KELTICKNIGHT

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2006, 04:05:32 AM »
WELL,GOT THE XJ REMAPPED to get rid of flat spot when picking up speed
well it worked,alittle more pickup as well,was going to k+n filter,was told was waste of money getting,pickup is alot better,theres a tiny flat spot,hard to notice,very happy with it,give it to frew friend to try out and they said big improvement to compared to way it was
cheers
Logged

Rikk

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2006, 09:57:49 AM »
Did they give you before and after bhp/torque figures as it would be good to know if the curves have moves and by how much.
Logged

KELTICKNIGHT

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2006, 10:43:46 AM »
bhp is up from 141 to 170
torque was 342 and now is 397
Logged

prozac

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2006, 11:28:25 AM »
both worthwhile increases :shock:
Logged

KELTICKNIGHT

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2006, 11:53:39 AM »
theres abig difference in pickup.wonder would getting k+n filter be any good
Logged

Barrel

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2006, 04:02:58 PM »
Quote from: "KELTICKNIGHT"
bhp is up from 141 to 170
torque was 342 and now is 397
....bloody hell....almost 400ft/lbs torque!  :shock:  :shock:
Logged

tim_aka_tim

  • Club Member
  • Forum Member
  • *
  • Guru: 1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4464
  • Vehicle: Honda Pilot
  • Year: 2008
  • Regional Organiser North America
(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2006, 04:36:20 PM »
Quote from: "Barrel"
Quote from: "KELTICKNIGHT"
bhp is up from 141 to 170
torque was 342 and now is 397
....bloody hell....almost 400ft/lbs torque!  :shock:  :shock:


Not quite, suspect its 397 Newton Metres
Logged

Barrel

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2006, 04:50:32 PM »
Quote from: "tim_aka_tim"
Quote from: "Barrel"
Quote from: "KELTICKNIGHT"
bhp is up from 141 to 170
torque was 342 and now is 397
....bloody hell....almost 400ft/lbs torque!  :shock:  :oops:  :oops: ..... still seems rather impressive
Logged

Mike Pavelin

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2006, 05:05:50 PM »
Will be interesting to see the MPG. :wink:
Logged

KELTICKNIGHT

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2006, 07:09:48 PM »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Powered by EzPortal