Birty Dastards Jeep Club

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Thermostat vs EFI  (Read 7622 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kwfulton427

  • Guest
Thermostat vs EFI
« on: September 07, 2005, 05:32:32 PM »

I know some efi's vary the fuel/air mixture based on the temp of the engine... is this the case for a TJ? and if so, can the sensors be changed to run at a cooler temp? say, 160 or 180?
Logged

Hoodoo

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2005, 06:36:48 PM »

The sensor varies the mixture over the entire operating range of the engine. If you want the normal operating temperature to alter, you'll have to get a thermostat rated at a different temperature to the one currently in the vehicle.
 Regards,
Logged

Mike Pavelin

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2005, 08:33:33 PM »

:? What are you trying to achieve?
Logged

Dingo

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2005, 09:46:03 PM »

A large backfire with flames :D
Logged

Anonymous

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2005, 09:58:06 PM »

I've tried Encona fuelled curries for that effect... :P
Logged

Dingo

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2005, 10:02:41 PM »

How do you get them in the tank, Funnel? :yawinkle:
Logged

kwfulton427

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2005, 10:06:05 PM »

lets say I put a 160 degree thermostat in... would this cause the fuel mixture to run rich because the sensor thinks the engine hasn't warmed up yet?
Logged

Bubba

  • "Cooter"
  • Marshal
  • Guru
  • *
  • Guru: 69
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 21029
(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2005, 11:11:21 PM »

noooo dont mess you wont gain anything worth having
Logged


trucks


shedric
cletus
mr whippy

I spent most of my money on alcohol, women and old  iron........ the rest of it I just wasted.

greggmo

  • Founder
  • Forum Member
  • *
  • Guru: 2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8230
(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2005, 11:24:42 PM »

there are better ways of wringing a bit more out of yer 4 popper. throttle boddy spacer, k&n and so on.
Logged

Dingo

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2005, 03:00:00 AM »

More fuel and less air wouldn't make it go any better, think about a carbed engine, imagine its warm and then put the choke on. Wont go, but it'll use a lot more juice. More air less fuel is the way to go. I think.
Logged

chrisjones

  • Forum Member
  • *
  • Guru: 4
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5841
  • Vehicle: Dogface
  • Sometimes I wonder....
(No subject)
« Reply #10 on: September 09, 2005, 07:46:22 AM »

More air AND more fuel is the way to go! :twisted:
Logged
God was my copilot but we crashed in the mountains and I had to eat him.

Mike Pavelin

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2005, 07:59:57 AM »

Won't make any noticable difference to performance. Engines are designed to work most efficiently at 180-190 so don't mess with it. If it runs too cool you could actually lose power.
The fuelling is controlled by the Jtec engine controller based on a set of data (or map) which is then constantly adjusted based on information from all the sensors on the engine, but the main player is the upstream oxygen sensor. Basically, once the engine is at operating temperature, the system reduces the fuelling until the sensor detects oxygen in the exhaust gases, then begins to ramp up the fuel until the oxygen disappears, then reduces it, increases etc etc... in an endless cycle. The only best way to get more power is to improve the engine's breathing, i.e. make it easier to get more air in and get rid of exhaust gases more efficiently. This could be through a larger throttle body, less restrictive air filter, forced induction or whatever, plus a more efficient exhaust system at the other end. If there is more oxygen available, the engine management will provide more fuel to get rid of it, and bingo! more power.
Logged

Dingo

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2005, 10:35:14 AM »

Kind of what I was thinking :) , but on a more technical level, well explained Doc.
Logged

kwfulton427

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2005, 03:15:28 PM »

thanks for the info...

i'd like to take a poll... what temp do your TJs actually operate at?

mine sits steady at 210
Logged

Manda

  • AKA Dangerous Doris
  • Founder
  • Forum Member
  • *
  • Guru: 0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3322
(No subject)
« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2005, 03:31:20 PM »

210? I presume that's farenheit?

Mine sits just a smidge under 100c.
Logged
AKA Dangerous Doris

Anonymous

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2005, 03:36:43 PM »

~100c unless the rad is blocked :)
Logged

kwfulton427

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2005, 04:37:59 PM »

yeah, its 210f (bout 100c)
Logged

Mike Pavelin

  • Guest
(No subject)
« Reply #17 on: September 28, 2005, 07:43:43 PM »

It should hover around the 210/100 mark
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Powered by EzPortal