Cool, mines a 1998 so should be ok then?
Quote from: ikebaddog on June 07, 2016, 09:05:06 AMCool, mines a 1998 so should be ok then?Had my front plate here for 4 years. It was fine for MOT, (it was a mate done all my tests) and been talking to plod beside it plenty of times and they said nuthin about it. This was from a 'normal' view of the plate ! NO fuckin clue how I got away with it. lol
Quote from: YT on June 07, 2016, 10:49:37 AMQuote from: ikebaddog on June 07, 2016, 09:05:06 AMCool, mines a 1998 so should be ok then?Had my front plate here for 4 years. It was fine for MOT, (it was a mate done all my tests) and been talking to plod beside it plenty of times and they said nuthin about it. This was from a 'normal' view of the plate ! NO fuckin clue how I got away with it. lol That isn't acceptable.MoT manual section 6.3. Reasons for rejection 2.c A registration plate not fixed vertically, or as close to vertical as is reasonably practical.The Road Vehicles (Display of Registration Marks) Regulations 2001The British Standard sets out the physical characteristics of the number plate. This includes visibility, strength andreflectivity. The British Standard also requires each number plate to be permanently and legibly marked with thefollowing information:-1. The British Standard number (currently BS AU 145d)2. The name, trade mark or other means of identification of the manufacturer or component supplier3. Name and postcode of the supplying outletCambridge English dictionaryNothing Spelt n-o-t-h-I-n-g
I've had no front numberplate for the best part of three years now, although I do put one on for MOT